Abstract
Background: Nε-acetyl L-α lysine is an unusual acetylated di-amino acid synthesized and accumulated by certain halophiles under osmotic stress. Osmolytes are generally known to protect proteins and other cellular components under various stress conditions.
Objective: The structural and functional stability imparted by Nε-acetyl L-lysine on proteins were unknown and hence was studied and compared to other commonly known bacterial osmolytes - ectoine, proline, glycine betaine, trehalose and sucrose.
Methods: Effects of osmolytes on the temperature and pH profiles, pH stability and thermodynamic stability of the model enzyme, α-amylase were analyzed.
Results: At physiological pH, all the osmolytes under study increased the optimal temperature for enzyme activity and improved the thermodynamic stability of the enzyme. At acidic conditions (pH 3.0), Nε-acetyl L-α lysine and ectoine improved both the catalytic and thermodynamic stability of the enzyme; it was reflected in the increase in residual enzyme activity after incubation of the enzyme at pH 3.0 for 15 min by 60% and 63.5% and the midpoint temperature of unfolding transition by 11°C and 10°C respectively.
Conclusion: Such significant protective effects on both activity and stability of α-amylase imparted by addition of Nε-acetyl L-α lysine and ectoine at acidic conditions make these osmolytes interesting candidates for biotechnological applications.
Keywords: Osmolytes, alpha-amylase, enzyme activity, thermodynamic stability, Nε-acetyl-L-lysine, ectoine.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj/jim/7000176] [PMID: 11938472]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2001.4819] [PMID: 11502004]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ps.0242603] [PMID: 12761396]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi020316e] [PMID: 12427007]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.2.1050] [PMID: 10625645]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03553.x] [PMID: 12828638]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606106103] [PMID: 16938858]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603772103] [PMID: 16899544]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00335.x] [PMID: 12220406]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00542.x] [PMID: 10841973]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007920100184] [PMID: 11354458]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0553-9] [PMID: 16957893]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00255-8] [PMID: 11960744]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.122.4.1239] [PMID: 10759521]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01614.x] [PMID: 19459961]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.06.005] [PMID: 20600783]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2006.08.012] [PMID: 17046342]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.100] [PMID: 29274422]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606236103] [PMID: 16968772]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103081200] [PMID: 11517217]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1759615] [PMID: 15260652]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9629(96)00275-7]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0102291]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00205053]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07160.x]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02770.x] [PMID: 22583374]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2014.02.015] [PMID: 24636996]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.036] [PMID: 16500607]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007920050116] [PMID: 10484175]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300815200] [PMID: 12702728]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.02.005] [PMID: 19254782]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07317.x] [PMID: 19765077]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12038-009-0044-0] [PMID: 19805899]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ps.9.2.344] [PMID: 10716186]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.10.004] [PMID: 17173966]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp303898g] [PMID: 22909409]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00113-3] [PMID: 11809416]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.03.003] [PMID: 20223266]