Abstract
Path planning is a way to define the motion of an autonomous surface vehicle (ASV) in any existing obstacle environment to enable the vehicle's movement by setting directions to avoid that can react to the obstacles in the vehicle's path. A good, planned path perceives the environment to the extent of uncertainty and tries to build or adapt its change in the path of motion. Efficient path planning algorithms are needed to alleviate deficiencies, that are to be modified using the deterministic path that leads the ASV to reach a goal or a desired location while finding optimal solution has become a challenge in the field of optimization along with a collision-free path, making path planning a critical thinker. The traditional algorithms have a lot of training and computation, making it difficult in a realistic environment. This review paper explores the different techniques available in path planning and collision avoidance of ASV in a dynamic environment. The objective of good path planning and collision avoidance for a dynamic environment is compared effectively with the existing obstacle’s movement of different vehicles. Different path planning technical approaches are compared with their performance and collision avoidance for unmanned vehicles in marine environments by early researchers. This paper gives us a clear idea for developing an effective path planning technique to overcome marine accidents in the dynamic ocean environment while choosing the shortest, obstacle-free path for Autonomous Surface Vehicles that can reduce risk and enhance the safety of unmanned vehicle movement in a harsh ocean environment.
Keywords: Path planning, collision avoidance, autonomous surface vehicle, unmanned vehicle, dynamic environment, artificial intelligence.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00172-0]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2004.827837]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20020426] [PMID: 31940855]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2016.04.018]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713827101]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0373463303002194]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00787-6]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AMC.2000.862927]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1213/4/042005]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02776-7] [PMID: 34764621]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.018]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037346330700447X]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2801881]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/160792642019052003023]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2009.932529]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2011.6160385]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308005134]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.09.008]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.007]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037346339800811X]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.32.1.65]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0373463317000753]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.456]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00011] [PMID: 33501180]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4173/mic.2013.4.3]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00790-x]