Abstract
Background: The unexpected detection of axillary lymphadenopathy (AxL) in cancer patients (pts) represents a real concern during the COVID-19 vaccination era. Benign reactions may take place after vaccine inoculation, which can mislead image interpretation in patients undergoing F-18-FDG, F-18-Choline, and Ga-68-DOTATOC PET/CT. They may also mimic loco-regional metastases or disease. We assessed PET/CT findings after COVID-19 first dose vaccination in cancer patients and the impact on their disease course management.
Methods: We evaluated 333 patients undergoing PET/CT (257 F-18-FDG, 54 F-18-Choline, and 23 Ga-68 DOTATOC) scans after the first vaccination with mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) (study group; SG). The uptake index (SUVmax) of suspected AxL was defined as significant when the ratio was > 1.5 as compared to the contralateral lymph nodes. Besides, co-registered CT (Co-CT) features of target lymph nodes were evaluated. Nodes with aggregate imaging positivity were further investigated.
Results: Overall, the prevalence of apparently positive lymph nodes on PET scans was 17.1% during the vaccination period. 107 pts of the same setting, who had undergone PET/CT before the COVID-19 pandemic, represented the control group (CG). Only 3 patients of CG showed reactive lymph nodes with a prevalence of 2.8% (p < 0.001 as compared to the vaccination period). 84.2% of SG patients exhibited benign characteristics on co-CT images and only 9 pts needed thorough appraisal.
Conclusion: The correct interpretation of images is crucial to avoid unnecessary treatments and invasive procedures in vaccinated cancer pts. A detailed anamnestic interview and the analysis of lymph nodes’ CT characteristics, after performing PET/CT, may help to clear any misleading diagnosis.
Keywords: Vaccine, COVID-19, PET/CT, cancer, lympho-adenopathy, lymph nodes.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-020-09337-2] [PMID: 33162671]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.07.037] [PMID: 34482101]
[PMID: 33067570]
[PMID: 33288844]
[PMID: 33778667]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.25728] [PMID: 33646823]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0846537121998949] [PMID: 34311551]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.03.001] [PMID: 33713605]
[PMID: 19293765]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090603] [PMID: 20032155]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3018349] [PMID: 31427907]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40336-021-00445-w] [PMID: 34277510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048430] [PMID: 23119014]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05414-z] [PMID: 34021394]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1729-9] [PMID: 21340453]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.121.262008] [PMID: 33820864]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003657] [PMID: 33883486]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.25928] [PMID: 34009000]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020210030] [PMID: 33507123]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10070652] [PMID: 34356507]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dc.24863] [PMID: 34432391]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05219-0] [PMID: 33560453]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003800] [PMID: 34115709]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210886] [PMID: 33904778]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2022.01.004] [PMID: 35131216]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/wjnm.wjnm_54_21] [PMID: 35018159]
[PMID: 34915816]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40336-022-00521-9] [PMID: 35992042]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05652-1] [PMID: 34928399]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.32604/or.2023.027705] [PMID: 37304242]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000529913] [PMID: 37033700]